by BRUSSELS/LONDON/CAPE TOWN, July 22 (Reuters) – Europe’s thirst for oil and gas to replace sanctioned Russian supply is reviving interest in African energy projects that were shunned due to costs and climate change concerns, industry executives and African officials said.
Energy firms are considering projects worth a total of $100 billion on the continent, according to Reuters calculations based on public and private company estimates.
African countries that currently have little or no oil and gas output could see billions in energy investments in the coming years, including Namibia, South Africa, Uganda, Kenya, Mozambique and Tanzania.
Namibia alone could provide around half a million barrels per day in new oil production, following promising exploratory wells in recent months, according to unpublished estimates by two industry consultants.
Africa as a whole could replace as much as one-fifth of Russian gas exports to Europe by 2030, based on estimates by the International Energy Agency (IEA). The Paris-based watchdog said an additional 30 billion cubic metres (bcm) of African gas a year could flow to Europe by then.
“As the world seeks to replace Russian oil and gas volumes … the industry is now focusing on the advantaged barrels Africa has to offer,” said Gil Holzman, CEO of Canadian oil explorer Eco Atlantic Oil & Gas, which holds interests in oil licenses in nearly 30,000 square kilometers offshore Namibia.
“The majors have been building larger positions … competitively bidding for exploration, development and production acreage,” he told Reuters by e-mail, citing activity in the oil basins off Namibia and South Africa.
European sanctions on Russian oil supply and reduced gas flows have sent prices soaring and driven up inflation to 40-year records in some countries. Benchmark Brent crude in March reached near a 15-year high of $139 a barrel.
Investment in African energy has yet to recover from a plunge in oil and gas prices in 2014, the IEA said in a June report, highlighting Africa’s potential to ease the supply crunch. Global oil output is set to rise from the pandemic but is then forecast to ebb in the late 2020s, it said.
“We are in the middle of the first truly global energy crisis and we have to find solutions to replace the loss of Russian oil and gas,” IEA executive director Fatih Birol told Reuters in an interview in June.
The IEA shocked the oil industry last year by envisioning no investment in new fossil fuel projects in order to meet net zero emissions goals by mid-century.
Companies and countries eyeing oil and gas investments in Africa are aware they must move fast to profit from untapped reserves before the global transition to low carbon technology renders many fossil fuel projects unviable, the executives and officials said, as domestic fuel and power demand also rises.
Last month, Tanzania signed a liquified natural gas (LNG) framework agreement with Norwegian state energy giant Equinor (EQNR.OL) and Anglo-Dutch oil major Shell that accelerates development of a $30 billion export terminal.
Patrick Pouyanne, CEO of French oil giant TotalEnergies , said on a visit to Mozambique’s capital Maputo in January that, if security improves, the company aimed to restart a $20 billion LNG project this year that was halted by militancy.
Pouyanne said in May that TotalEnergies needed to make up for declining output and sanctioned Russian supply and was speeding up activity in Namibia, a promising oil frontier.
“Now there is a lot of activity to try to force forward these projects,” said Gonçalo Falcão of global law firm Mayer Brown, which advises firms in the African energy space, citing East African gas projects worth tens of billions of dollars. “There is clearly a sense of opportunity to reinforce them.”
BIRTH OF VENUS
For new African oil, nowhere looms larger than Namibia.
Not yet a producer, Namibia has had top companies sifting through geographical data and probing its waters for decades until Shell hit in February an “encouraging” supply of light oil – the kind coveted to produce scarce gasoline and diesel.
Nearly two months into the Ukraine crisis, with oil prices near record levels, Shell launched a “back-to-back” exploration well at the site – meaning one well immediately following another – for the first time in the company’s nearly 150-year history, according to two industry sources, who declined to be named as exploration continues.
Shell said the quick progress followed the “promising” results of the first well but cautioned in a statement to Reuters that, due to its climate commitments, it would only advance projects “with a credible path to early development … (that are) resilient and competitive in low- as well as high-price scenarios.”
TotalEnergies completed an exploration well in the nearby Venus prospect in March, which it called “significant”, with a more advanced appraisal well due in the third quarter.
On Namibia, TotalEnergies told Reuters it will “still have to determine if the volumes are commercially recoverable … (but) investments remain necessary to satisfy demand”.
A senior Shell official, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, estimated it will take around $11 billion to develop the two companies’ blocs.
The discoveries could lead to oil production of around half a million barrels per day, according to projections by data firm IHS Markit and estimates from natural resources consultancy Wood Mackenzie shared with Reuters. Both firms cautioned the forecasts were preliminary.
Maggy Shino, petroleum commissioner at the Ministry of Mines and Energy told Reuters time may be running out as the global transition to clean energy looms: “There is a possibility for Namibia to be the last African giant.”
“In the wake of the success in drilling off Namibia comes the Ukraine and Russian war … what we are seeing (is) that currently more companies are looking to invest in Namibia in the search for hydrocarbons,” she said, adding the country hopes to begin production from the Shell project by 2026.
Source: Reuters
